Monthly Archives: November 2011

Right to Food Jan Manch

MKSS was at the Right to Food Jan Manch held at Jantar Mantar on 29th November 2011. This was in support of a universal PDS system and no cash transfers.

For more information, read Jean Dreze – Kaun Banega Scorepati

The following is the memorandum from the Jan Manch.

29 November 2011

To:       All Members of Parliament

National Food Security Act: Memorandum from Right to Food Campaign

Today, 29 November, hundreds of us from around the country have gathered at Jantar Mantar in another effort to voice our demand for a comprehensive National Food Security Act.

During the last two and a half years since June 2001, the Right to Food Campaign has consistently advocated the enactment of a comprehensive National Food Security Act, including not only a universal Public Distribution System but also other measures to protect people’s right to food, such as (1) universal nutrition, health and pre-school education services for children below the age of six years, under ICDS, (2) nutritious, cooked midday meals for all children in the age group of 6-14 years, (3) maternity entitlements and other facilities (e.g. counseling and support for optimal infant and young child feeding) for pregnant and lactating women, (4) special assistance (including social security pensions) for marginalized groups and persons/communities at risk of hunger. Along with this, the Campaign advocates revitalization of local agriculture, assured Minimum Support Prices, decentralized procurement and storage, and the inclusion of pulses, cooking oil and millets in the Public Distribution System.

The Food Ministry’s draft of the National Food Security Bill, posted for comments on the Ministry’s website in September 2011, falls short of all these demands and even trims down the very modest entitlements proposed by the National Advisory Council. The main goal of this draft seems to be to minimize the obligations of the government, restrict people’s entitlements, and avoid any accountability.

We are particularly alarmed by the following aspects of the draft National Food Security Bill:

  1. The Bill is based on a narrow vision of what is required to ensure food security, restricted mainly to foodgrain rations under the Public Distribution System (PDS).
  2. Even within that restricted approach, the Bill is deeply flawed. It perpetuates the failed model of “BPL targeting” and threatens to undermine what is already there.
  3. The bill has reduced the entitlements in the PDS to a mere 7kgs cereals per person per month entitlement if a priority household and 3kgs per person if general. When the ICMR norms state that the quantity consumed per month per adult is 14kgs cereal.
  4. The Bill neglects the rights of children (particularly children under six), including those – such as universalization of ICDS – already due under Supreme Court orders.
  5. The grievance redressal provisions are very weak.
  6. The Bill allows the central government to replace food entitlements with cash transfers on its own terms, without any safeguards.
  7. The draft has no safeguards against commercial interference in supply of food in schools and anganwadi centres.
  8. The draft gives sweeping powers to the central government, including powers to modify most entitlements and prescribe binding guidelines for all relevant schemes.
  9. The coming into force of the Act is not time-bound.

A more detailed critique of the Bill is attached.

We are also concerned that the Bill relies on a division of the population into three groups (Priority, General and excluded), without any clarity as to how these groups are to be identified. The Socio-Economic and Caste Census (SECC), while possibly an improvement over earlier BPL Censuses, is highly inadequate for this purpose. Among those who have joined us today at Jantar Mantar are many poor people who are at risk of exclusion from the Priority group because of the flawed nature of the SECC’s scoring system.

We reiterate our demand for a comprehensive National Food Security Act, which includes a

  • A Universal PDS which includes pulses, cooking oil and millets, with food entitlements based on ICMr norms. , so that all, especially the food insecure, the vulnerable, and the deprived not only get included but also get sufficient nutritious  food.
  • Appropriate MSPs and decentralised procurement of not just rice and wheat but also millets and pulses.
  • No link with any “caps” based on official poverty estimates.
  • ‘Universalisation with quality’ of ICDS including the provision of nutritious locally prepared food for all children.
  • Universal non-conditional maternity entitlements for 6 months.
  • Entitlements for vulnerable groups such as pensions for the aged, single women and persons with disabilities, maternity entitlements and community kitchens

 

We urge you to ensure that the National Food Security Bill is not tabled, let alone enacted, in its present form.

 

 Contact: Secretariat, Right to Food Campaign, 5 A Jungi House, Shahpur Jat, New Delhi 110049. Tel 011-2649 9563. Email: righttofoodindia@gmail.com.

(Website: www.righttofoodindia.org)

 

from Dainik Bhaskar 30 Nov 2011

 

Aruna Roy speaks at SCM Sophia

On 22nd November 2011, Aruna Roy delivered the annual lecture for Catalysts of Change, at SCM Sophia.

 

 

Jan Sunvai on Electricity in Bhim

MKSS Public Hearing on grievances related to access and provision of electricity
3rd November, 2011

The MKSS organized a public hearing in the Bhim tehsil, Rajasthan on the grievances that arise in the access and distribution of electricity. The public hearing was attended the District Collector, Executive Engineer of the Electricity Department other Government officials and workers and the residents of Bhim.

The public hearing particularly focused on two pertinent issues. It highlighted the nature of implementation of the Central Government’s Rajiv Gandhi Grameen Vidyutikaran Yojana (RGGVY) its flagship programme to provide free electricity connections to BPL households. Personal testimonies during the public hearing outlined the range of concerns that affected people were having with the nature of implementation of the RGGVY, such as- inadequate supply of electricity, improper reading of the meters, electricity supply without corresponding billing, non supply of all components meant to be provided along with a new electricity connection, under the RGGVY, monopoly of private companies and their collusion with Government officers. Secondly, the public hearing highlighted the urgent need for a focused legislation on grievances faced by citizens over a range of schemes and programmes, and their structural redress. It was unanimously agreed upon that there is a need for a decentralized grievance redress mechanism, in tune with local concerns and needs. Modes of peoples participation like social audits, jan sunvais were cited as positive examples of monitoring the implementation of Government programmes, which need to be held widely on a more regular basis.

With reference to the above, the following resolutions were passed on the basis of a consensus arrived at by the participants of the public hearing, while welcoming the move of the Central Government to introduce a legislation on Grievance Redress:

1) Demand for a strong and independent District level Grievance Redress Authority/Commission that will be responsible for receiving grievances, imposing penalties on errant officials and award appropriate compensation to the aggrieved.
2) Demand for an independent Peoples’ Service Center at the Block level that will facilitate citizens in filing their grievances and complaints, issue dated receipts to acknowledge all grievances and complaints, track the status of grievances through an integrated system and be held responsible for escalating grievances not dealt by the Grievance Redress Officer within a specified time period, to the independent District Grievance Redress Commission automatically in the form of an appeal.

The participants strongly urged the Government to look into the resolutions, to solicit greater support for the proposed Grievance Redress Bill. The participants also declared that they would continue to engage in non-violent democratic forms of protests and struggle for the fulfillment of their demands.

Signed:
Shankar Singh, Aruna Roy and Nikhil Dey
For the MKSS Collective